What are flying rods. What are flying rods Flying rods

flying rods

skyfish(from the English "sky" - "sky" and "fish" - "fish"), they are also often called "rods"(eng. "rods") - image artifacts in the form of elongated thin objects with a longitudinal flickering "fringe", created by fast-flying insects falling into the video frame.

For the first time, the American ufologist Jose Escamilla, who conducted amateur video filming, drew attention to this phenomenon (USA, New Mexico, 1994). He was the first to start targeted searches and surveys of skyfish. According to Escamilla, these objects exhibit complex behavior, and may have the rudiments of intelligence. Following Escamilla, a lot of people around the globe took up the search for "rods". A huge amount of video and photographic materials of different quality has accumulated, and even unsubstantiated statements about the capture of these creatures.

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010 .

  • Summer II de Macon
  • flying pancake

See what "Flying Rods" is in other dictionaries:

    FLYING LIZARDS- (Pterosauria) Suborder Ramphorhynchus (Ramphorhynchoidei) Genus Ramphorhyncus RAMPHORHYNCH Genus Dimorphodon DIMORPHODON Suborder Pterodactyls (Pterodactyloidei) a detachment of extinct Mesozoic reptiles flying, whose wings were formed by leather ... ... Collier Encyclopedia

    Unidentified Flying Objects

    Unidentified flying objects- For an article on sports equipment, see Flying disc. A UFO allegedly observed in New Jersey in 1952 (from the archives of the CIA) UFO (unidentified flying object, eng. unidentified flying object) “the perception of an object or light visible in the sky or over ... Wikipedia

    John Dies at the End (novel)- John dies at the end of John Dies at the End

    Unknown flying object- UFO allegedly sighted in New Jersey in 1952 (proven fake) (from CIA archives) "UFO" redirects here; perhaps you were looking for an article about fil ... Wikipedia

    UFO- For an article on sports equipment, see Flying disc. A UFO allegedly observed in New Jersey in 1952 (from the archives of the CIA) UFO (unidentified flying object, eng. unidentified flying object) “the perception of an object or light visible in the sky or over ... Wikipedia

    Unknown flying object- For an article on sports equipment, see Flying disc. A UFO allegedly observed in New Jersey in 1952 (from the archives of the CIA) UFO (unidentified flying object, eng. unidentified flying object) “the perception of an object or light visible in the sky or over ... Wikipedia

    UFO- For an article on sports equipment, see Flying disc. A UFO allegedly observed in New Jersey in 1952 (from the archives of the CIA) UFO (unidentified flying object, eng. unidentified flying object) “the perception of an object or light visible in the sky or over ... Wikipedia

    Plover family (Charadriidae)- This is the central family of shorebirds, to which the vast majority of species of the order belong. The characterization of this family largely coincides with the characterization of the order as a whole, already given above. All related to the family ... ... Biological Encyclopedia

    tinamaceae family- The body of birds of this family, due to the strongly developed pectoral muscles, is thick; the neck, on the contrary, is thin and long, and the head is small and flat; the beak is long, thin and curved, without a horny outgrowth at the end, rather covered with a horny mass, ... ... Animal life

Details Created: 05/01/2009 15:27 Views: 11814

What are Flying Rods

Many have already heard about the phenomenon of "flying rods", and the brothers Escamillo, José and Manuel introduced us to them. On March 5, 1994, they filmed a UFO in the sky of New Mexico for 16 minutes, and at the moment when one brother was passing the camera to another, an unidentified object of an elongated shape was caught in the frame, which rushed across the sky at incredible speed. He was noticed by ufologist expert Clifford Stone, to whom the Escamillo brothers, ufologists with almost thirty years of experience, brought their films with UFOs. The term flying rod belongs to Manuel - it was he who first called this mysterious object. Usually the rods look something like this: a long, elongated body, similar to a cigarette with small wings along the entire body. Presumably, with the help of these wings, the rods move, and their sizes, as mentioned above, vary from a couple of centimeters to three to five meters.

Soon, people began to notice more and more often this strange phenomenon: when watching videos taken on videotapes, instantly flying objects were found. Many people think that this is a bad recording or a defective camera or VCR. Someone seriously believes that in fact it is an unknown species of life. These are some living creatures, which were given the name - "flying rods". They fly at supersonic speeds. Agree, it's hard to believe that these creatures can reach speeds of up to 10,000 thousand km / h, and their length can be from 5 centimeters to several meters. These creatures have a wingspan of approximately 30 cm. Their color is golden brown (in some photographs this is clearly visible). It is likely that these creatures have intelligence: many eyewitnesses claim that they saw how the "rods" moved in pairs, circled around the same place, or simply moved in one direction, as if they had their own specific purpose.


One of the most famous images of darts was taken over Albany Airport, New York in 2002.

Over time, the shooting became more and more. Many are trying to understand what it really is. Some speculate that this is deliberately set up by television in order to force people to stare at their TV screen without stopping. And some believe that this is a new kind of life on Earth. If this is set up by television, then how to explain the fact that these "flying rods" were seen in Maine, New York, Colorado and over forty other states, and there is a clear example of this. The clearest images and the clearest and most legible video footage ever taken in the history of the study of this phenomenon were obtained in the “swallow cave”. There, "flying rods" create the unimaginable.

During the skydiver's jump, the "rod" flies past him, at the same time making a circle past the person. At the same time, its length, width, shape and all other proportions are preserved. (When a person jumps with an unopened parachute, his speed can reach 500 km / h). Please note: when viewing records of jumps in the gorge, one could see several moments when the “rods” described an arc or made turns. At the same time, their length and straightness were preserved. A point object (insect), even with discrete lighting, will look like a straight line on the recording, but not like a flying stick. They were featured in a documentary filmed by National Geographic - in some frames you can see how a flying rod appears from under the surface of the ocean and soars into the sky, and you can clearly see how the water diverges as this object rises. Of course, they got there by accident, because due to the incredible speed of movement, it is impossible to spot them with the naked eye.

However, experts say that somewhere in the archives of the US Army there is a film on which a flying rod moves across the sky no faster than an ordinary bird. Moreover, the video cameras installed on one of the Shuttles managed to film the flying rods even in space!

Or, for example, let's take the fall of the Su-27 missile at the Lviv air show. Scientists have noticed objects surrounding the ship. What is it - pieces of rocket skin or an unidentified flying object. Most likely, this is a “rod”, which has only reached a huge size. Before the destruction of the WTC on September 11, seconds before the collapse of the eastern tower, one of the cameras recorded a similar object.


Most likely, these mysterious creatures have been living on our planet for many centuries, but before there was no person who would have pushed people to reveal this secret. The proof that "flying rods" were seen several centuries ago is the cave paintings of ancient people in Talampay. The stone depicts "flying rods". Looking at the picture, you can not hesitate to say that they are. But let's not jump to conclusions.

Some believe that insects or, for example, hummingbirds fly in front of the camera, and due to the high speed of the wings, a smeared image is obtained, which we take for a “flying rod”.

Here is the opinion of the master of physics: Yevgeny Kornshtein: “An insect flies in front of the lens much closer than a person, with a huge angular velocity, and so a straight blurry trace is obtained. Wing beat imprints are recognizable to any insect specialist. Insects flying much closer to the camera than the high diver in the frame manage to fly straight enough distance to leave a similar trail on the film. Their angular velocity is the only thing the camera can capture. The speed of the insect turns out to be much greater than the angular velocity of a person in the frame - he is further away.

There is another version of the explanation of this phenomenon. It sounds like this: on the screen we see not a “flying rod”, but a glare from the sun. After all, all the photos were taken on a clear sunny day. But personally, it seems to me impossible that the glare from the sun creates a distinct image of the rod.

Let's get back to the facts: these mysterious rods were seen not only from the ground, but also in space. It was filmed from the spacecraft how “flying rods” fly by against the background of the “starry sky”. How can this phenomenon be explained? Scientists claim that meteorites or other foreign objects cannot fly near the spacecraft. Then what is it, if not a "rod"?

Some eyewitnesses claim that "flying rods" pass through solid objects. The proof of this is a photograph where the "rod" passes through the roof of a residential building. So these insects are interdimensional. "But how?" - you ask, - "this can not be." It's against all the laws of physics!" Yes, theoretically it is impossible, but facts are facts.

What are they?

There are a great many versions. Someone, as always, seeks to see alien interference in everything and considers the rods to be alien reconnaissance robots. For example, UFO Magazine, a very authoritative magazine in the field of paranormal research, recently published an article entitled Flying rods - surveillance from other worlds? In favor of this approach are pictures of flying rods in low Earth orbit, taken by cameras from the NASA shuttle. Plus the amazing characteristics of the rods, the same speed that they are able to develop in the air. It is difficult to imagine that beings consisting of the same flesh and blood as the rest of the inhabitants of the Earth could do this.

However, most researchers believe that the rods are a form of earthly life unknown to science. The fact that we never encountered them before 1994 is easily explained. They are impossible to see with the naked eye! And until 1994, no one had thought of carrying out the manipulations with video recordings necessary for observation. In addition, if you pay attention to the shots in which the rods fly out from under the water, it can be assumed that they live at great depths, where people have not yet reached. In other words, ten years ago, the Escamillo brothers may have made the greatest discovery in the last few hundred years without knowing it.

But that's not all. While studying the videos, the researchers came to a surprising conclusion - it is very likely that these creatures have a mind, or at least its rudiments. Many records clearly show how gracefully the rods go around any obstacles, moreover, there have been cases of observing entire groups of flying rods, which gives grounds for the assumption that social activity is not alien to them. In Mexico, not far from the town of Sotano De Las Golondrinas, a cave was discovered, chosen by the rods - the pictures taken inside the cave clearly show that there are a great many of them in the cave. Considering that they are most often found in places that are not very accessible to humans, it is not surprising that acquaintance with the rods happened so recently. Although experts on the rods say: in fact, they are everywhere among us. You just need to be able to see

.

On the 10th anniversary of the discovery of flying rods, researchers received an unexpected gift. Namely, the message that the Spirit rover accidentally photographed an unidentified flying object in the sky above the red planet. At first it was assumed that Spirit filmed one of the seven aircraft sent at different times to Mars and now circling the planet. However, after carefully studying the trajectories of these devices (four of which, by the way, are Russian-made), scientists came to the conclusion that it could not be any of them. At the moment, the question of the nature of the phenomenon filmed by the rover remains open.

Anyone can shoot a flying rod, it would be a little patience and a decent video camera. The camera should be positioned so that most of the frame is occupied by the sky, but it is absolutely necessary that there is also some other object standing on the ground, such as a tree or a pillar, in the frame. This is necessary so that, based on its dimensions in the frame, it is possible to calculate the dimensions of the filmed rod and the distance to it.

The shutter speed of the camera must be set to the minimum that the camera is capable of. And, of course, you should stock up on a fair amount of patience. However, this is far from the only way to hunt rods. A Mexican rod explorer became famous for catching a whole bunch of these mysterious creatures from the comfort of his home. How? Elementary: I watched TV, recorded programs, and then meticulously studied the materials in slow motion. He managed to find a lot of evidence of the existence of flying rods from the most diverse corners of our planet - from Mexico to Korea. So it's available to everyone. Is it possible that flying rods are swarming with our local news as well?

Many are interested in the question - does the government know about this phenomenon? Most likely, yes, since all the materials about aliens and UFOs in the government were strictly classified, these materials were more difficult to access than materials about the hydrogen bomb. Some air force officials say the government has a huge amount of classified UFO material and photos.


Not so long ago I watched a movie about "flying rods", at least that's what they are called. I want to briefly talk about the "rods" (for those who have not seen the film, or have not encountered similar phenomena. If you have not seen the film, you can watch it)

In general, there are certain creatures in the world, or rather, phenomena that different people, at different times, in different parts of the world, recorded on a photo, or film. To see this phenomenon live, as practice has shown, is impossible (although some claim to have seen it). This phenomenon was popularly called "flying rods" because of its shape.

Later this was filmed, which brought popularity to this phenomenon. After the release of the film, more photos and videos appeared. There are several hypotheses about what it is. Modern science, as always, does not want to deal with such "nonsense", therefore, mostly amateurs are engaged in the study of the phenomenon.

Some say that the "rods" are insects in flight, accidentally caught in the frame. But this assumption cannot be called correct, since it was possible to photograph the “rods” in such places where it is quite difficult for an insect to climb, if at all possible. And the shape of the "rods" in the photo is unlike any insects. It was also possible to photograph the “rods” of very large sizes, which insects cannot in any way be.


For example, in this photo, the "rod" is simply gigantic in size

There are also supporters of the theory that these are "aliens". Dear ufologists, with all due respect, but still you can’t blame the aliens for everything. Although some of the photographed "rods" may well be some kind of aircraft (perhaps not terrestrial), but not all.

To date, the network has accumulated a huge amount of photos and materials about the "rods", some of which I publish in this article.
From all these materials follows:
- "rods" move in the air at great speed.
- you can see them only in a photo or video, you can’t see them with the naked eye.
- they can fly through solids (it seems ... in some movie I saw that one flew through a board or plywood, I don’t remember exactly).
- they are everywhere, when you carefully watch any TV channel or movie (for example, in slow motion), you can see them, which is confirmed by practice.
- the principle by which they move in the air is not clear.
- no one has managed to catch them so far ... (a funny phrase came out) ... as well as UFOs :)

... In general, several months have passed since I learned about the "rods" (and already managed to forget about them), when I came across an article on the Internet about a certain Grebennikov and his "gravitolpan". Grebennikov tells about his gravitoplane in the book “My World”, which I immediately downloaded and began to look for “interesting” things there. Later he began to "dig", to analyze, and as a result, "scribbled" his own article about it. And here, while writing this article, I remembered the “flying rods”. There is already a lot in common between the "gravitoplane", the mysterious insects that helped Grebennikov in his discovery, and the "flying rods".
Well, for example, Grebennikov claimed that during the flight he, along with the “graviplane”, became invisible, or the visibility was distorted, he also said that he could develop very high speed (and this despite the fact that his miracle gravitation plane beat homemade, made of boards and the remains of an old bicycle).

The rods also have a high flight speed and are invisible to the “naked” eye, and in the photo they turn out to be strikingly similar to each other (despite the large difference in size). It seems to me (I think so :)), the similarity between the photographed “rods "of such a different size is due not to the structure of their" body "(or what they have there instead of it), but to the peculiarities of their movement. Take a look at the photos below.








These are quite "standard", similar to each other. Moreover, the “rods” themselves are transparent, but their “wings” are not, this is very clearly visible in the photo. In simple insects, it is usually the other way around, in the photo the wings are seen worse (which is natural).


And this one is more like an insect located at two points in the photo at once. Here the "rod body" is not transparent. (The usual smeared image of an insect, the fact that this insect is clearly visible, you can distinguish the wings and body. It looks like a beetle, or a huge fly. The photo itself looks like those when an object moving at high speed enters the frame - the object turns out to be smeared) Perhaps because he was flying at a slower speed, or due to other (unknown) reasons.






And here is where it gets really interesting. The pictures show that the "rods" are, as it were, "cut" into two parts. How can he (the rod) fly in one direction in two parts? :). Of course, maybe that part of the “rod” that is in the middle of the film was not fixed, but why? Could one part of the "body" fly faster :), or be more transparent than the rest? Although it may just be an optical effect. But on the first photo (out of these three) it is clearly seen that all the rods of the “body” are “cut”. Those. the cut “rod bodies” can be fixed on film at a certain point in time.

It would be more logical to conclude that in fact the film captures not the “rod body”, but some kind of space curvature (matter, air, ether - I don’t know what, but this is not the “rod” body) that it produces during the flight, and you can see this curvature is only on film. Like, for example, with glowing balls in photographs, or when people notice ghosts in photos that were not seen live (a bit of an unfortunate comparison, but I can't do better). This assumption to some extent also explains the transparency of the “rod body”. It can also explain the "breaks" in the "rod bodies" - perhaps sometimes, under certain, unknown circumstances, or (most likely) at a certain point in time, the object simply "jumps" a part of space and then, at this place, a "gap" is formed.


And with the help of such a simple “station”, the author took pictures. For some reason, they look better this way. You can also try. The author assures that this way they can be fixed very often. I haven't tried it yet, but I definitely will.

But here's what's interesting, in the book Grebennikov says that the success of flights was influenced by weather conditions and, in particular, flights were impossible in winter, when there was snow. I have also not seen a single photo where one could observe the "rods" in winter (insects do not fly in winter - 100%), if anyone has one please send.


Never in my life will I believe that these are small UFOs. Throw a stone at me if this is not a cluster of those same insects, or others with the same capabilities.


Click on the photo and when you zoom in you will see insects and "rods" together in the photo. It can be assumed that the "rods" in this photo are insects. They just fly differently, or at different speeds, or they are different insects. Let's not rule out the possibility that this is a UFO :)

True, some photographs (and especially video) do not really testify in favor of insects, which implies:
- or there are other types of creatures (larger) with the same capabilities (hardly of course).
- or large "rods" - these are aircraft (or rather, the trace of their flight recorded on film), which fly according to the same principle.

Here is another intersting image of an aircraft (the famous movie "Orion Conspiracy"). The device has a cellular structure of the bottom and it has a triangular shape. Grebennikov also argued that the best shape for his platform would be that of a triangle.

thanks to user mackay for the tip

And this is a drawing from Grebennikov's book. It seems?..

In short, my conclusion is:
- There are some insects in the world that, with the help of certain properties, mechanisms, or organs, can move at an incredibly high speed while remaining invisible (at least to the human eye) and not making any sounds during the flight. In all likelihood, they move outside of our material space, creating some kind of temporal-spatial curvature (or something like that), which can be fixed with the help of photo and video shooting. Grebennikov discovered this effect and used it on his "super stool". In addition to him, this effect was discovered and used, and is now being used by some organizations (most likely secret ones :)) to create aircraft.

Yet most of the photos of the "rods" are just photos of insects in flight, but not all. Apparently, more than one species of insects has miraculous properties, and there are many such species of insects and they live in almost all corners of the planet. It can also be assumed that these insects are known to scientists, but no one suspects their “miraculous” properties, just as Grebennikov did not know until a certain moment, although the insect that discovered this secret was known to him.

How many coincidences have been shielded.
Your comments in any case will be a compliment to my wild imagination :)

And here is another interesting video about UFOs that can only be seen on film, they fly so fast that we simply do not notice them. Well, it is, by the way :)

They are known as skyfish, are extremely beautiful, and are said to be dangerous by catchers.

Do flying rods really exist?

This name, celestial fish, this cryptid received because of the characteristic "fringe" along the edges of the elongated body.

Thanks to her, it seems that the animal literally soars in the air, like a stingray.

The speed of individual individuals reaches a stunning 200-300 km / h.

Outwardly, they resemble worms or snakes of a whitish, less often golden color.

The creature does not have pronounced limbs, like a head.

Subspecies differ only in fringe. In some, it is segmented and resembles the wings of a dragonfly, in others it is solid, resembling the wing of a stingray in movement.

Despite the rather modest dimensions, up to 30 cm, the cryptid can be dangerous, even fatal. Catchers of these creatures claim that in the spring-winter period they are poisonous.

In Japan, they not only believe in their existence, they hunt “flying fish” there, and even, as some masters of this art claim, have turned this activity into a sport. Honey and tuna are used as bait.

In captivity, this cryptid does not live long, turning into jelly in just a couple of days. Apparently, the "flying fish" do not have a backbone.

In addition to Japan, the animal was also seen in Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus and Mongolia. Przhevalsky may even have described these snakes in his book "Mongolia and the country of the Tanguts."

No one knows exactly where these animals came from. Some cryptozoologists admit that they are of an alien nature.

In the mid-1990s of the last century, a new word entered the lexicon of ufologists and other researchers of anomalous phenomena - "Rods" they are also "Augers" (from the English "rods") or "Skyfish" (from the English "sky" - "sky" and "fish" - "fish").


This phenomenon refers to image artifacts in the form of elongated thin objects with a longitudinal flickering "fringe" (auger). For the first time, ufologist Jose Escamilla, who conducted amateur video filming, drew attention to this phenomenon (USA, New Mexico, 1994).

He was the first to start targeted searches and filming of "augers", since then both supporters and opponents of the phenomenon have appeared in different countries. Ufologists associate the "augers" with UFOs or alien activity, cryptozoologists consider them an unknown new life form, and the prosaic explanation says that the "augers" are created by fast-flying insects falling into the video frame!

One of the most prolific Ukrainian researchers of "augers" lives in Kharkiv. Sergey Olegovich Petrov became interested in them in parallel with a whole cohort of other anomalous phenomena with the beginning of the third millennium. He is not a supporter of blind denial, moreover, in the process of a long study, he came to his own final conclusions about the true nature of the “augers”. Today he answers the questions of "Ukraine Anomalous" in an exclusive interview.

- Sergey Olegovich, how did you get into anomalistics?

I became interested in ufology in the late 1980s. At the end of 1989, I had a chance to see a UFO for the first time, which, in fact, influenced my passion for exploring the unknown. Since 2009, he began to cooperate with the Kharkov planetarium and ufological organizations in Ukraine. From time to time I participate in various expeditions. Since 2011, I have been cooperating with a Kharkiv organization specializing in the study of underground structures. Every month I hold meetings on anomalistics in the Kharkov planetarium.

- When and how did you first become interested in the phenomenon of "augers"?

A documentary film about the discovery by Mexican ufologists in 1994 of the so-called “augers” or “rods” phenomenon was seen only in the early 2000s. The standard UFO phenomenon of various shapes was mostly heard in the sky, but the new discovered phenomenon mainly had an oblong cane shape and differed in the length of the body. And seriously engaged in this anomaly since 2007.

- Did you personally encounter him (“phenomenon”)?

In 2007, on one of the playgrounds of the kindergarten, I accidentally recorded a passage of similar anomalies on a video camera, which flew into a concrete slab at high speed, leaving no traces when they disappeared. These objects became noticeable only when viewed frame by frame, as they were not visually noticed. Since I could not attribute what I saw to natural phenomena known to me or flying representatives of the fauna, I realized that the phenomenon of "Flying rods" (augers) also manifests itself in Ukraine. When I carefully looked through my videos from the Crimea for 1996 and 2006, it turned out that a new phenomenon was repeatedly recorded in large quantities. This phenomenon was not so rare in comparison with the "UFO" phenomenon and gave more opportunities in its study.



- How often did you come across Ukrainian augers in your practice? Which episode surprised you the most?

Basically, most of all "augers" are found in the Crimea, but not only. The most amazing episodes turned out to be those that, by their manifestations, made it possible to make a number of new discoveries in this phenomenon. Some of them: in 2002, while recording eyewitnesses of a fighter plane crash into a crowd of spectators at the Lvov airfield Sknilova, the moments of reading the cause of the plane crash were recorded; in 2006, when recording the Alchak reef in Sudak (Crimea), I recorded a rod flying at great speed from the edge of a cliff and a rod flying with electronic engine noise, in 2009, during video hunting on the Alchak reef in Sudak (Crimea), I was fixed a clear moment of departure of the rod from the rocky surface; in 2009, when filming a birthday party in the corridor of the house, an auger was recorded flying out of the sideboard, which, having flown a minimum of the trajectory and touching the birthday boy, flew back into the sideboard, during the materialization and disappearance of which claps were recorded; in 2009, during a video filming of a wedding in the village of Laznia (Poltava region), a rod was recorded with a given trajectory, the purpose of which was to scan the stack of the drinker with ultrasound, which is clearly audible opposite the location of this stack. In general, there were very, very many such cases!

What are the main characteristics of "augers"? How do they differ from their main relatives, the ubiquitous but elusive UFOs?

These flying devices have a different shape, mainly a cane-shaped body. Sometimes there are small wings on the body. Also often the wings are helical in shape, which are located along the entire length of the body. The visualization of the augers depends on the length of the flying devices themselves, and so, due to the flights at high speeds, it is almost impossible to notice them! When identifying these flying objects, I often listen to the audio background at the time of the flight, which can come from objects and have an anomalous sound character, both during flights, and at the moments of materialization or disappearance, which is not characteristic of insects. Also, flying rods may indicate unusual changes in the trajectories of the passage of objects that contradict the aerodynamic properties of insects. I consider the theory of the appearance of this phenomenon from any parallel worlds unreasonable, since nothing indicates this and is not confirmed by anything!

- There are different versions of the origin of "augers". Which one is the most plausible in your opinion?

Considering all the facts that I have discovered over several years of studying this phenomenon, these objects are tools for reading information (measurement parameters) of the history of events on Earth in time continuums from the future. At first, I assumed that these could be flying insects that accidentally or deliberately fell on our planet, but in 2008 I was able to classify this phenomenon in detail. When listening to audio at maximum volume during the passage of one of the rods, I clearly heard artificial electronic noise coming from the engine of this flying object, which could not be related to insects in any way, but has technological properties. It is possible that in the distant future our planet will become dead, but traces of civilizations will remain on it, which will be noticed by other highly developed ECs flying near the Earth. With their high level of development, the CCs were able to conquer space and time, moving in the time continuum. Driven by curiosity, they install time teleports (“time machines”) on a dead planet and near-Earth orbits and, with the help of new technological devices, study its history. These manifestations of "Flying rods" today, as well as various "UFOs" can be tools for reading all types of information from the future EC. This is also indicated by the properties of unidentified flying objects with unexpected materialization, as well as an unexpected disappearance in space, which indicates in favor of the work of the time machine in the future. This is also indicated by the fact that in most cases "Flying rods" and "UFOs" appear before events that only have to happen, that is, which should be known in advance.

It sounds trite, but according to skeptics, this cannot be, because this can never be. The most common explanation for "augers" is birds and insects smeared in flight ...

Of course, most skeptics will assume that this phenomenon does not exist and that it is only an optical effect of video filming, supposedly insects turn into ramrods due to exposure. This is partly true, but this opinion is generally erroneous. "Flying rods" tend to move quickly in space, faster than the speed of perception of our vision, and it is not surprising that we do not notice them. Also, objects automatically lose the status of an insect, as they appear in all environments: vacuum (space), atmosphere, and even in water (oceans). Recording flights in the photo and video during the frosty winter season also contradicts the properties of insects. On the video, you can see the moments of the materialization of flying objects, as well as their disappearance, which do not change the nature of the structure of bodies during takeoffs and departures of material objects, which contradicts the recognized laws of physics of our time.

What advice can you give experts to distinguish between real augers and photos of smeared birds and insects?

For many researchers, there is no question of recognizing the very fact of the reality of UFOs, but for me there is no question of recognizing the phenomenon of "Flying rods". I advise experts to use the entire set of technological progress to study the principles of operation of the devices themselves, and not waste time on their provability. And I want to remind skeptics that if some things seem too fantastic to someone, then sometimes they do not realize that they themselves are the main characters of this fantasy!